- An intelligence report blames pro-Ukraine forces to sabotage of the Nord Stream gas pipeline.
- The operation resulted in a spike in gas in Europe.
- Ukraine denied having any knowledge of such groups.
US officials have seen new intelligence that indicates a “pro-Ukrainian group” was responsible for the sabotage in 2022 of the Nord Stream gas pipelines, the New York Times reported on Tuesday, claims dismissed by a senior Ukrainian official.
In a cautious report that did not identify the source of the intelligence or the group involved, the Times said the US officials had no evidence implicating Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the pipeline bombing.
But the attack benefitted Ukraine by severely damaging Russia’s ability to reap millions by selling natural gas to Western Europe.
At the same time, it added to the pressure of high energy prices on key Ukrainian allies, particularly Germany.
The intelligence suggested the perpetrators behind the sabotage were “opponents of President Vladimir V Putin of Russia”, the Times report said.
“Ukraine has nothing to do with the Baltic Sea mishap and has no information about ‘pro-Ukraine sabotage groups’,” presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak tweeted on Tuesday.
READ | ‘There were no other positions’: Ukraine vows to defend Bakhmut amid persistent Russian attacks
US officials had no indication of who exactly took part or who organised and paid for the operation, which would have required skilled divers and explosives experts.
They believed those involved were probably Ukrainian or Russian nationals, and that none were from the US or Britain.
This handout picture released by the Danish Defence Command shows the gas leak at the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline as it is seen from the Danish Defence’s F-16 rejection response off the Danish Baltic island of Bornholm, south of Dueodde.
German investigators believed the unidentified group was made up of five men and one woman using professionally falsified passports, according to separate German media reports.
German officials had identified the boat suspected to have been used in the attack, according to the broadcasters ARD, SWR and weekly magazine Zeit.
The yacht in question was said to have been rented out by a company based in Poland, belonging to two Ukrainians, per the German report, which referred only to sources in multiple countries.
The commando group is said to have set sail from the north German port of Rostock on 6 September 2022 and was localised the following day on the Danish island of Christianso in the Baltic.
The yacht was subsequently returned to the owner uncleaned, with investigators able to find traces of explosives on the table in the cabin, according to the detailed report.
The pipelines were ruptured by subsea explosives on 26 September, seven months after Russian forces invaded Ukraine.
US officials have “no firm conclusions” about the intelligence, “leaving open the possibility that the operation might have been conducted off the books by a proxy force with connections to the Ukrainian government or its security services”, the Times said.
The lack of a firm suspect meant international intelligence officials had not ruled out the possibility of a “false flag” operation to link the attack to Ukraine, per the German media.
Authorities in Germany, Sweden and Denmark have opened probes into the incident.
A spokesperson for the German government said it had “taken note” of the New York Times’ report, referring back to the ongoing investigation.
Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson told reporters late on Tuesday:
There is an ongoing preliminary investigation in Sweden, so I do not intend to comment on those reports.
Speaking at the same press conference, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg echoed the remarks, saying it would be “wrong to speculate” before the investigations were completed.
In February, veteran US investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reported that the US was behind the operation to bomb the Nord Stream pipelines and that Norway assisted.
The White House blasted Hersh’s report, which cited an unnamed source, as “complete fiction”.